Learning Goal: I’m working on a english writing question and need a sample draft

Learning Goal: I’m working on a english writing question and need a sample draft to help me learn.n the Precis, you will be expected to write a summary of your Research Paper Topic; however, you will not be able to offer any outside evidence/information. You want to convince me of your stance using your own ideas and thoughts. Brevity is required. In terms of the Precis structure, you will want to write a 250-word paragraph that is designed to convince the readero begin this assignment, compose your Precis by addressing the following requirements:Introduce your Research Paper topic and state your Thesis Statement.
Convince your reader, me, to believe your Thesis; you are persuading me to agree with you.
Offer a clear, fully-developed body, offering your ideas and thoughts.
DO NOT use any research information; the only voice and information are yours.
You must acknowledge the main opposition idea and address it via refutation or concession
Write no more than 250 words, but no fewer than 200 words.
no need for a work cited page since all the information you are using are yours from the research paper.My topic: (The Death Penalty, Is It Justifiable?)My Thesis: (Capital punishment’s presence in society and American law is an ineffective solution and the better solution is to find alternatives for it and also remove it from the constitution as a punishment for crimes.)Precis RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis20 to >17.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThesis expresses a sophisticated, in-depth opinion about the subject giving the paper strong structural direction and establishing a persuasive stance.17 to >15.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThesis expresses an in-depth opinion about the subject establishing the general structure of the paper while establishing a persuasive stance.15 to >13.0 ptsAlmost ThereThesis is vague/generalized providing an inadequate structure for the paper, and persuasive stance is not clear.13 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThesis is unclear, absent, or unrelated to the subject and there appears to be no planned structure, and persuasive stance is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence20 to >17.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsEvidence is solely author’s ideas or thoughts and supportive of thesis.17 to >15.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsEvidence is solely author’s ideas or thoughts and somewhat supportive of thesis.15 to >13.0 ptsAlmost ThereEvidence is mostly author’s ideas or thoughts that lack relevance and development.13 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementEvidence is not author’s and not relevant to the claim of the precis or missing entirely.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpposition20 to >17.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe opposition for the main counter argument is acknowledged and refuted or conceded, whichever is most appropriate.17 to >15.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe opposition for one counter argument is acknowledged and refuted or conceded, whichever is most appropriate.15 to >13.0 ptsAlmost ThereThe opposition for one counter argument is acknowledged, but not refuted or conceded to beyond a superficial level.13 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe opposition is mentioned, but not refuted nor conceded, or not mentioned at all.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization10 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsPresents information in an intelligible way with a logical flow of ideas, subject or point, and good effectiveness.6 to >2.0 ptsAlmost TherePresents information in a less clear way: flow of ideas, subject or point, is a little illogical, and impairs effectiveness a bit2 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresents information in a haphazard way: flow of ideas, subject or point, is illogical, and loses effectiveness.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions10 to >6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsInfrequent, minimal errors have minor impact on overall message.6 to >2.0 ptsAlmost ThereErrors are frequent and cause confusion. Some aspects may be correct, but still impair writing2 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementErrors are serious and numerous, causing the reader to struggle to discern meaning.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersuasiveness20 to >17.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe Precis is persuasive.17 to >15.0 ptsAlmost ThereThe Precis is fairly persuasive, but has one or more weak areas that detract from persuasiveness.15 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe Precis is informational, but not persuasive.20 ptsTotal Points: 100
Requirements: 200-250 words   |   .doc file

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *