As above. Last writer did not meet the criteria and paper failed with only 28/100% so needs rewritten/edited. I have attached the word version and the PDF which has lecturer comments below. I have also attached the references to be used as part of it.

Sytematic review for my masters degree. Only the results, discussion and conclusion needs to be written.
I Will upload my paper what i have so far and the criteria.
I am a dutch student so perfect English is not requiredIn appendix 1 and 2 are the criteria
There is no criteria for the amount of sourcves used. But ofcourse while writing the discussion references are needed. So use as many as needed

an anatomical description of blood flow through a normal fetal heart (i.e. after week 12)
• an anatomical description of blood flow through a fetal heart with simple d-TGA
• an anatomical description of blood flow through a fetal heart exhibiting complex d-TGA
Restrict your descriptions to the anatomical arrangement of the heart, great vessels and any relevant fetal shunts.
Your submission should be well written, comprehensively referenced with peer-reviewed publications and not exceed 500 words.

Please answer the following question:
1. What type of contribution can a human rights approach make to achieving universal health coverage? Instructions •
The papers should be approximately 4-6 pages long; • Choose only one question to answer; • There will rarely be right or wrong answers. The evaluation of the papers will be based on how well the answers are supported; • Any system of referencing can be used as long as all of the data necessary to identify the source is present. Simply listing URLs is not satisfactory. It is necessary to list authors, title, publication, and date; • Please put your name on your paper so it can be identified after it is printed out for evaluation.

1 Title page (including Group# & member names)2 Introduction (discussing the global, national, state and local implications of the group policy change and explaining how and why the group selected to focus on this particular policy change. At the end of this section the group should set forth the Group’s proposed policy change in brief);3 Results (this is where the group states their findings – What the cost of the policy change is expected to entail, sources of funding to implement and maintain said policy change (i.e. the details, the specific language of your policy change);4 Discussion (this is where your group explains what comparable legislation and support for the group policy change having used the literature and other authoritative external sources to support the arguments made. Also, discuss other similar policies and/or if this policy exists elsewhere, as well as, identifying and addressing the expected concerns of suspected opposing interest groups;5 Conclusions & Recommendations (this is where you can explain how the policy change accomplishes the group’s ideals/intent of the policy).2.8.2 APA Style is required only for in-text citations in each of the five sections noted above and the references.3. Additional Guidance & Requirements3.1 Citation of a source is required for each paragraph, on each table/chart used and in every sentence where a number appears3.2 At least one source citation substantively used in each paragraph is required.3.3 Data and Sources. All data (facts and figures/statistics) shall be referenced appropriately. References and in text citations shall be in APA Style format. For those students that need help with proper APA in text citation and references, please see the following link: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/. Additional APA Style links and documents will be posted on the Class online site. Also, see www.refworks.com – this source is available free to FIU students and will assist you in formatting references properly in APA and other formats. An additional source http://bruteforcestudyguide.com/essaywriting/apastyle.html 8. Required Section Headings/Content in Paper.

Your assignment is to critique of a pharmacoeconomic paper. You can select your own pharmacoeconomic paper or use one of the ones I have provided.You will be required to submit a 500-1000 word report suitable for submission to your manager to be considered by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. It will describe the results of your thorough critique and any other research that you may have done to complete your critique. Please also submit a PDF of the paper that you reviewed even if you use one of the papers I provide.Your critique of the pharmacoeconomic paper quality should be based on the questions presented as ‘A check-list for assessing economic evaluations’, as set out in Drummond, M.F, O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.L., and Torrance, G.W., Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 4th edition Oxford/New York/Toronto: Oxford University Press which are also found online through links provided in the material to the National Library of Medicine (NLM). I recommend you use the below worksheet which summarizes the questions provided by Drummond et al., and the NLM. *The Drummond evaluation framework to be used is attached, please ensure to use this framework for the assignment.The rubric for this assignment is attached.The concepts by Drummond et al. needed for this assignment can be found below:
Module 3 National Library of Medicine: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/edu/healthecon/03_he_intro.htmlModule 4 National Library of Medicine:
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/edu/healthecon/04_he_01.htmlPaper selection:
I’ve attached a selection of pharmacoeconomic (PE) papers that can be selected for this critique. Please only select one based on the writer’s own comfort. If based on the writer’s comfort, they would like to use another PE paper (not included here), this can be done as well, please send me a note on which PE paper was selected.Additional helpful resource:
Please see attached and below:
Pharmacoeconomics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlxMLG5xs9w&t=1s

Section A -3000 words related witha work based issue ( I would like to discuss about work related stress due to confused and delirious patients ( some of them diagnosed with dementia or delirium due to infections), lot of staffs had to take stress leave due to physical aggressive behaviour of patients towards staff , outcome is staff shortage.Section B -1500 words …critically reflect on personal learning style ( I prefer visual and auditory learning , and reflective and experimental learning)

this is an occupational theraphy assignment , its an adult treatment activity , you will develop a treatment activity based on the short term goals in the attached document , pls be sure to use occupational therapy level of assistance abbrevations when making the treatment activity for the case. you are to develop 3 treatment sessions according to the 3 short term goal , for example , patient will complete UB dressing using the RW for support and therapist giving CGA ……, make each treatment activity one paragraph of at least about 5 sentences each suing all the level of assistance . this is also a link to the video that will help in developing a related treatment plan https://youtu.be/B7_iNNmsytk pls be sure to send me a message if you do not understand the question.

The Coursework Portfolio is a body of work involving a mix of collaborative and individual tasks based on the practical study of histopathology and haematology cases. You will be working with a variety of tools to produce a range of content that can be reviewed formatively and assessed summatively. These tasks will involve laboratory practicals, digital case studies, and workshops that will generate content for assessment.
In P3 you will be using an immunohistochemical technique to demonstrate the presence and histological distribution of (cyto)keratins in selected tissues. The practical will be assessed by critical evaluation of the results presented as a figure with commentary.
The two case studies, one each for Cellular Pathology and Haematopathology be rooted in the cognate lectures, practicals, and workshops. In both case you will know the diagnosis but you will be asked to discuss aspects of the laboratory diagnostic workflow and underlying pathobiology.

HI you have already written the piece for me I have attached the dissertation with my supervisors comments as well as mine is there any chance you can edit and add more content to it please.If you can see the comments please let me knowAlso because I don’t know what keywords you used when searching for the literature could you create a graph with what key words you may have used and write as well how many results came up etc . to the best of your ability , thanks