I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ have attached 1 image of the class textbook & 2 screenshots of the assignment. PLEASE follow all instructions and include all REQUIRED material listed on assignment sheets/images attached. Paper NEEDS 4 peer-rev‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍iewed research articles within the last 5 years!! A total of 5-6 references are NEEDED with the course textbook being 1 reference. The title page and reference page are separate and not included in the 4-5 pages required‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease see attached rubric and template for the completion of the paper. Portions of the paper were already done and will be attached. Please add the completed portions to the final template. ( The sources to be used are attached via the literature review) Please review the completed portions of the paper that are attached as well. Please utilize a scenario for nursing students in the SIM lab for communicating with the physician and the outcome. PLEASE NOTE: The are 7 clinical groups with a total of 50 students. Please note instructions below (SEE RUBRIC) In this assignment, students will: Describe the results of their Education Practicum Project, based on the outcomes they have established for their Education Practicum Projects and consistent with their PICOT questions. They will describe quantitative and qualitative results and evaluate whether their intervention was effective. ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍They will also describe the limitations of their project, if any. Write a conclusion for their final project including their initial purpose or goals, results, and advice for future educators. Entire Education Practicum Complete with all sections present, reference page, and appendices. Criteria for Content Provides quantitative and/or qualitative results of the Capstone Project. Evaluation of effectiveness of the intervention Limitations of project Implications for theory development, research, teaching, and/or clinical practice. Conclusion of entire project, including purpose, results, and advice for educators. Preparing the Assignment Criteria for Format and Special Instructions Use the Education Practicum Project Paper template for the assignment. Rules of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and syntax are followed. APA formatting, a title page, and references are required‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ssignment 1: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Abdomen ABDOMINAL ASSESSMENT Subjective: • CC: “My stomach hurts, I have diarrhea and nothing seems to help.” • HPI: JR, 47 yo WM, complains of having generalized abdominal pain that started 3 days ago. He has not taken any medications because he did not know what to take. He states the pain is a 5/10 today but has been as much as 9/10 when it first started. He has been able to eat, with some nausea afterward. • PMH: HTN, Diabetes, hx of GI bleed 4 years ago • Medications: Lisinopril 10mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Metformin 1000mg, Lantus 10 units qhs • Allergies: NKDA • FH: No hx of colon cancer, Father hx DMT2, HTN, Mother hx HTN, Hyperlipidemia, GERD • Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys) Objective: • VS: Temp 99.8; BP 160/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 248lbs • Heart: RRR, no murmurs • Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical • Skin: Intact without lesions, no urticaria • Abd: soft‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍, hyperactive bowel sounds, pos pain in the LLQ • Diagnostics: None Assessment: • Left lower quadrant pain • Gastroenteritis PLAN: This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses. The Assignment 1. Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation. 2. Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation. 3. Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not? 4. What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis? 5. Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. – Pls ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍include references and intext citations

a‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ research question you have about nursing or midwifery practice and implement a database search to obtain articles relating to your question. please , may you use a resarch question about ‘Postpartum Depression’. must use a template for this task and A template has been provided for this task. In your assessment you will need to address each of‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ the following: • propose a research question including a PICO/PICo, • conduct a key word Medline and CINAHL search and present the search histories of both, • provide the references of 4 papers relating to the research question, and • comment on why evidence-based practice is important for nurses and midwives? (include 1 reference in this ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍section).

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍his is a case study-style dissertation. Topic: The Use of Restrictive Interventions in Mental Health Services: A Case Study. I have written a short proposal which you can develop further, I will u‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍pload it and some useful resources. The referencing style should be APA 6th Edition. Also, I will like the writer to be uploading it chapter by chapter so that I can be submitting it for feedback‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍n this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings. To Prepare: Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery. Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.” Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research. For information about annotated bibliographies, visit https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/an‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍notatedbibliographies The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page with 6-7 references) In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following: Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format. Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper. Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles. Use APA format and include a title page. BOOK: NURSING INFORMATICS & THE FOUNDATION OF KNOWLEDGE 5TH EDITION BY MCGONIGLE & MAS‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍TRIAN

F‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍irst essay | 2500 words First assessment: – Times New Roman, size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student number printed as a footer on every page. Harvard style referencing The majority of references should come from primary sources (e.g., journal articles, conference papers, reports) Identify a communicable or non-communicable disease, or health condition of interest. Provide a critical overview of this disease or condition, including a justification of your choice in relation to its importance to public health. The essay should include a concise, critical evaluation of the existing body of evidence, underpinned by epidemiological data and analysis that identify causation/association, risk factors, at-risk populations and trends. Your work should include and cover the following sections/aspects and content (as shown and stated in the table below): Introduction: An introduction to the assignment that establishes the importance of the chosen communicable or noncommunicable disease, or health condition of interest. Relevant information should aim to provide a critical overview of the specific disease or health condition considered, and examine its importance to public health in order to justify the choice made. (15 Marks) Discussion: Examination, taking a critical evaluation approach, of the relevant epidemiological evidence focused on the specific disease or health condition chosen (from published epidemiological studies) including identification of strengths and limitations of specific aspects of these studies (suggestions below) which are most relevant, including methods used and interpretation of results in studies, taking into consideration that it may be the case in some instances that a study fails to report some details on methodology that you wish to evaluate (. details for adequate bias control measures). This examination, taking a critical evaluation approach, therefore also needs to be underpinned by epidemiological data and analysis from these studies in order to identify risk factors for acquiring the specific disease or health condition, highlight relevant trends and at-risk populations and demonstrate an understanding of relevant measures of association and principles of causation. In addressing specific aspects of the studies in relation to their strengths and limitations, you may consider the most relevant of the suggested specific aspects below: i) Study objectives and hypothesis (the main purpose of the study, including research question, a supportive hypothesis and objective(s)) ii) Study design (its appropriateness in reference to the research question and objective(s)) iii) Study population (recruitment including inclusion and exclusion criteria) iv) Exposure and outcome & their measurement (for example, for cohort studies, were outcomes defined at the start of the study; for case-control studies, did the exposure precede the outcome, etc.) v) Internal validity (likelihood that the results are affected by selection bias, observation/measurement bias, confounding factors, in case of an intervention whether randomization was done correctly & the assessments of outcomes were blinded, etc.) vi) Data analysis and results (appropriateness of the statistical methods used and interpretation of the results) vii) External validity (generalizability of the study findings) Implications: Consider the relevant epidemiological evidence (critically) examined from published epidemiological studies in the preceding sections of the assignment, and build up on it by proposing possible implications or applications for epidemiological research, public health practice or policy, ensuring that you identify strengths and limitations of these implications/applications. (20 Marks) Conclusion: Effective summary of key points. (10 Marks) Presentation and Referencing: High quality presentation that conforms to principles of academic writing and contains minimal errors in sentence construction, grammar and punctuation. The assignment followed appropriate academic conventions regarding in-text citations and referencing. Second essay (part 1) | 2000 words Second assessment: Based on the same topic chosen for the first essay, identify an epidemiological study that has been ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍published in a peer-reviewed journal within the past 5 years: Summarize the study and then critically evaluate the evidence that it provides to public health practitioners. In doing so, identify and explore its weaknesses and limitations, and make robust recommendations for how the study could have been improved (2000 words). Please note that the epidemiological study that you choose to focus on for this assessment should not have been considered in the first assessment point. Your work should include and cover the following sections/aspects and content (as shown and stated in the table below). Introduction: An introduction to the assignment that clearly states what the communicable or non-communicable disease, or health condition of interest is (as the assessment task is based on the same topic chosen for essay 1), introduces the selected epidemiological study and establishes the importance of the selected epidemiological study for public health research and/or practice. Relevant information should aim to provide a brief summary of the selected epidemiological study and discuss its relation to contemporary public health research and/or practice. Please make sure that the epidemiological study that you select for this assessment has been published in a peer reviewed journal within the past 5 years. Also, please note that the epidemiological study that you choose to focus on for this assessment should not have been considered in the first assessment point. (15 Marks) Discussion: Critical evaluation of the quality of the evidence (with a focus on the findings) offered by the selected epidemiological study taking into account what it provides for public health practitioners and key uses of this epidemiological evidence in public health (for example, (epidemiological evidence on environmental health risk assessment used in the development of environmental health policies, or that from clinical studies on the use of drugs and placebos to discover information that is critical for improved medical decision making, etc.). With reference to relevant epidemiological theory, identify and explore the weaknesses and limitations (for example, study methodology, up-to-date applicability etc.) of the selected epidemiological study. (35 Marks) Implications: In relation to the selected epidemiological study, critically discuss recommendations able to minimize the identified weaknesses and limitations (for example, study methodology, up-to-date applicability etc.) and therefore improving the epidemiological study. Relevant recommendations should be based on contemporary epidemiological theory and practice. (25 Marks) Conclusion: Effective summary of key points. (10 Marks) Presentation and Referencing: High quality presentation that conforms to principles of academic writing and contains minimal errors in sentence construction, grammar and punctuation. The assignment followed appropriate academic conventions regarding in-text citations and referencing. Second essay (Part 2) | 500 words: Using a style appropriate to a non-academic audience (for example, newspaper readers), summarize this study, outlining its significance for public health (500 words). For this particular part (Part 2) of this second assessment point, please remember that you must use exactly the same epidemiological study that you chose to use for Part 1 of this second assessment point. Your work should include and cover the following sections/aspects and content (as shown and stated in the table below). The specific percentage marks allocated to each section/aspect of your work is stated below. Communication of science to the public Summarize the selected epidemiological study (including its findings), outlining its significance for public health, in a form of a written communication, using a style appropriate to a nonacademic audience. This should not exceed 500 words. Please remember that you must use exactly the same epidemiological study that you chose to use for Part 1 of this second assessment point. (75 Marks) Presentation: High quality presentation that is written clearly for a nonacademic audience and contains minimal errors in sentence construction, grammar and punctuation. Don’t worry about the student number, I’ll apply it after it’s finished‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

L‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍eadership Development Portfolio Please create this Leadership Development Portfolio for Registered Nurse who works in Home Care Agency as a Field Nurse and planing after Graduation college with BSN to become a Nurse Manager . Your response should be well constructed in APA format ,double spaced, 4 pages in length, cover page is separate please. Thanks A Leadership Development Portfolio (LDP) is a personal map utilized to provide you with a guide to achieve personal and professional goals. It helps individuals to focus on areas which need development and utilizes one’s strength to improve these areas. Purpose: To exhibit what has been learned during the semester in regards to leadership development. To strengthen personal philosophy of leadership by exploring strengths, areas of deficit and action plans for success. To create a development plan that can be used beyond this leadership course. To connect concepts discussed throughout the course for practicality in the development of personal and career endeavors. Your task is to prepare a type-written Leadership Development Portfolio that outlines the below aspects. All of these aspects are to be in one document. Portfolio must include: Vision statement for personal development: As the author discussed in chapter 7, a vision is a mental model of an ideal future state. I want you to develop a vision statement for your career and life, which provides a picture of your future, is grounded in values, and advocates a change towards a new or more developed state. The vision statement should reflect your future goals and aspirations. The vision statement should also give the reader(s), you and me, an idea of what you need to improve on. I expect this part to be no more than a paragraph. Ramapo College Vision: Where do you see yourself at the end of your Ramapo College journey?? Leadership traits and top strengths: Similar to how the author described each of the leaders, I want you to describe yourself (1 paragraph) and highlight your traits and characteristics? Areas of personal/ professional strength and areas of development: From what you know of yourself and what the self-assessment tools in your book, list and describe three (3) areas in which are your most strongest and three areas in which you need development. Explain why these identified areas matter and how they may affect your future goal(s). For your areas in need of development, specify in detail how can these be improved.? Goals: You will have to state your future goals (in accordance with your vision statement and your areas in need of development). Think about your goals in terms of five (5) areas: individual goals (self-improvement); interpersonal goals (r‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍elationship improvement); team/organizational (improve teamwork and organizational impact); civic community goals (be a force for good in the broader world); professional goals (positive influence on your profession). Choose any of these 5 areas to state your goal and make sure that you explain them by highlighting the following: why is it important? What benefit will you or others receive if you achieve this goal? You should have no less than 3 and no more than 5 goals listed.? Action plan: With the above stated goals and areas of development, provide an action plan of measurable ways you will improve on these areas. Be creative in this section of your development plan. Do NOT give simple statements such as, “In order to improve on my shyness, I need to talk more to people.” This kind of statement is mediocre. In-essence, you should describe strategies to meet each goal. Include action steps or changes you will need to make in order to achieve them. Also, include how your leadership strengths can help you in achieving your goal. You may wish to consider challenging assignments you will seek; developmental relationships you will look for with people who can provide mentoring and support; voluntary leadership roles you will seek; training you will need to complete; feedback you need to obtain; the means of reflection you will engage in; or other ways you will seek to achieve your goals. Please note, you must provide an action plan for each listed goal and an estimated realistic completion date. ??In essence, you will have: Goal 1: Action Plan: Completion Date: Measuring your progress: For each goal, provide a statement identifying how you will know when you have achieved this end or completed this goal? How will you measure and monitor your progress?? External resources & networks: Which individuals and external resources do you have that can help you in achieving your goals, refining your leadership skills, and providing feedback and support? Provide names of specific people, offices, resources that can help you with your goals. State what purpose will this person serve and what role will they play in your plan.? Mission Statement Use information that you already know AND that you have acquired about yourself throughout the course to build a personal mission statement. Give thoughtful consideration to this process, as it takes reflection and rewriting. Include phrases and sentences that reflect both who you are now and what you want your life to be about; specifically, the things you want to do, the kind of person you want to be, and the positive impact or contributions you want to make during your lifetime. Please note that your MISSION STATEMENT IS DIFFERENT THAN YOUR VISION ST‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ATEMENT.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍n overview of the disease: etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentations, labs and diagnostics, differential diagnosis and treatment. The presentation must be in a Word document doubled spaced and must follow the American Psychological Association (APA) format. You must include at least 5 references. The references must be dated from 2016 to present. Two of the references must be from a peer review medical journal within t‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍he discipline of the subject of your presentation. One peer review reference must be electronic and you must hyperlink the article and it must have a functional link. Medscape, Up To Date, and Web MD are not acceptable references. The minimum word count for the entire presentation is 2,000 words. You must cite the references used in the presentation and the citations must follow the American Psychological Association (APA) format‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease see attached below and follow the instructions. Rubric is the most important part of this assignment which needs to be followed because based on that they will grade the paper. Thank you You are required to cite to a minimum of four sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide 7th edition. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Reminder: Please indicate the answer for each question so I would know what part of the qu‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍estion you are talking about or responding. References are needed to be within the last 5 years and not older than 5 years (From 2017 and up). The paper must be in the newest APA style 7th edition. Please do not copy and paste from the original site where you find the info but use your own word and understanding and write about it. Please answer each question and its requirements carefully. Each paragraph you write about it requires a reference. Also, for an article title in a reference, only capitalize the first word, proper nouns, & the first word after a colon or hyphen. References: capitalize the journal title in a reference; need publisher for book- not location. Please follow up the 7th edition APA style. For this assignment at least I need 4 to 5 references please. Thank yo‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍u